Optimization Of The Penggerak School Program At The Educational Unit Level

Authors

  • Gayus Sadarman Tafonao Univercity State of Jakarta/Education Management, Jakarta
  • Sugiarto Sugiarto Univercity State of Jakarta/Education Management, Jakarta 
  • Siti Rochanah Univercity State of Jakarta/Education Management, Jakarta 

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56910/ictmt.v1i2.100

Keywords:

optimization, peggerak school program, educational units

Abstract

Based on the Decree of the Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1177/M/2020 concerning the Penggerak School Program, the determination of the educational unit as the implementer of the Penggerak School Program is carried out by selecting the Head of the Education Unit who has learning leadership, learning that supports students and a willingness to learn that represents diversity throughout Indonesia (differentiated learning). The presence of the Penggerak School Program began with an independent curriculum development program which started from the implementation of the 2013 curriculum which was considered too rigid, the material was too dense and learning loss was caused by the impact of online learning during the Covid-19. The method used in research is libarary research methods. In general, this research describes the results of the penggerak school program carried out at the educational unit level, so that it can encourage the transformation process of educational units in order to increase student learning outcomes  character in order to realize Pancasila students. Penggerak School  Program has several advantages, namely being a school that can provide guidance to other schools (model school), getting assistance from expert trainers, accelerating school digitalization & improving the quality of school principals and teachers. Schools that take part in the Penggerak  School Program will be expected to have output as a pioneer force in the transition to the independent curriculum. 

Author Biography

Sugiarto Sugiarto, Univercity State of Jakarta/Education Management, Jakarta 

 

 

References

Ayundasari, L. (2022). Implementasi Pendekatan Multidimensional dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah Kurikulum Merdeka. Sejarah dan Budaya: Jurnal Sejarah, Budaya, dan Pengajarannya, 16(1), 225-234.

Andriani, W., Subandowo, M., Karyono, H., & Gunawan, W. (2021). Learning loss dalam pembelajaran daring di masa pandemi corona. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Pem belajaran, 1(1), 484–501.

Arifin, Z. (2019). Evaluasi Program. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arikunto, S., & Jabar, C. S. A. 2014. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jakarta, PT Bumi Aksara

Ariyani, M. C. D. (2023). Evaluasi Program Sekolah Penggerak Di Smp Islam An- Nahl Cibubur (Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Negeri Jakarta).

Darodjat, D., & Wahyudhiana, W. (2015). Model Evaluasi Program pendidikan. Islamadina: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 1-23.

Daryanto, H. (2014). Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Farida, Y. T. (2000). Evaluasi Program. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Lahir, S., Ma’ruf, M. H., & Tho’in, M. (2017). Peningkatan prestasi belajar melalui model pembelajaran yang tepat pada sekolah dasar sampai perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Ilmiah Edunomika, 1(01).

Mahirah, B. (2017). Evaluasi belajar peserta didik (siswa). Idaarah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 1(2).

Madaus, George F., 1983. Michael S. Scriven, dan Daniel L. Stufflebeam. Evaluation Models: Viewpoints on Educational and Human Services Evaluation. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.

Mendikbudristek. (2022). Pedoman Penerapan Kurikulum Dalam Rangka Pemulihan Pembelajaran.https://kurikulum.gtk.kemdikbud.go.id/pelaksanaankeputusanmendikbudristek-nomor-56-m-2022-tentang-pedoman-penerapan-kurikulumdalam-rangka-pemulihan-pembelajaran/

Mahmudi, I. (2011). CIPP: Suatu model evaluasi program pendidikan. At-Ta'dib, 6(1).

Ndeot, F., & Jaya, P. R. P. (2021). Deschooling dan Learning Loss pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. PERNIK: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 4(1), 18–28.

Novalinda, R., Ambiyar, A., & Rizal, F. (2020). Pendekatan Evaluasi Program Tyler: Goal-Oriented. Edukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan, 18(1), 137-146.

Nurhasanah, N., Sukmawati, S., & Syukri, M. Evaluasi Program Guru Penggerak Di SMA Kabupaten Kubu Raya. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa (JPPK), 11(9), 1308-1320.

Nugrahaningsih, V. P. (2020) Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Nilai Kemanusian Di Sekolah Dasar Insan Teladan Kalisuren, Tajur Halang, Parung – Bogor (Tesis, Universitas Negeri Jakarta)

Owen, J. M. 1993. Program Evaluasi: Forms and Approaches. St. Leonards: Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd.

Patilima, S. (2022, January). Sekolah Penggerak sebagai upaya peningkatan kualitas pendidikan. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dasar.

Pratiwi, W. D. (2021). Dinamika learning loss: Guru dan orang Tua. Jurnal Edukasi Nonformal, 2(1), 147–153.

Ramdhan, M. (2021). Metode penelitian. Cipta Media Nusantara.

Rusdiana, 2017. Manajemen Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Rurisman, R., Ambiyar, A., & Aziz, I. (2023). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Sekolah Penggerak Di SMA Dengan Model Evaluasi Cipp. Jurnal Muara Pendidikan, 8(1), 124-130. https://doi.org/10.52060/mp.v8i1.1064

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31

How to Cite

Gayus Sadarman Tafonao, Sugiarto Sugiarto, & Siti Rochanah. (2023). Optimization Of The Penggerak School Program At The Educational Unit Level. International Conference On Digital Advanced Tourism Management And Technology, 1(2), 391–397. https://doi.org/10.56910/ictmt.v1i2.100

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.