Comparative Analysis Of Saw And Topsis In Selecting Recipients Of Basic Food Assistance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56910/ictmt.v1i1.61Keywords:
Decision Support System, Simple Additive Weighting (SAW), Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), basic foodAbstract
The Basic Food Program is one of the Indonesian government's alternative programs for distributing aid to underprivileged or poor communities. A selection process needs to be carried out to determine recipients of basic food assistance. Decision Support Systems are effective systems used to produce calculations with output in the form of rankings. The methods that are quite widely used are the Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) method and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). This research aims to apply the SAW and TOPSIS methods in selecting aid recipients so that appropriate results are obtained which can be proposed as solutions to decision-making problems. There are 6 criteria used in this case, including: residence, occupation of the head of the family, type of floor, type of wall, place to urinate, lighting source. The data used as a test is data from the Banyuurip village community in 2023. The calculation process is carried out by finding the weight value of each alternative for each criterion. The selected aid recipients are those who have the greatest value as the best alternative. From the calculation results of the SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) and TOPSIS methods, the calculation results of the two methods were obtained. The alternative with the largest value or rank 1 produced by SAW and TOPSIS was both selected as alternative A10. Of the 12 data tested, SAW and TOPSIS have 50% similar alternative ranking results, including: rank 1 = A10, rank 5 = A9, rank 7 = A7, rank 8 = A6, rank 11 = A2, and rank 12 = A12. The SAW method gets better results compared to the TOPSIS method, because it gets precise, stable results and shorter processing time.
References
Cahya Purnomo, D., Yanti, M., & Widyassari, A. P. (2021). Pemilihan Produk Skincare Remaja Milenial Dengan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (Saw). Jurnal Ilmiah Intech : Information Technology Journal of UMUS, 3(01), 32–41.
Dedek Cahyati Panjaitan, Hengki Juliansa, Robi Yanto. (2021). Perbandingan Metode Saw Dan Wp Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Kasus Pemilihan Kegiatan Ekstrakulikuler. Jurnal Ilmiah Binary STMIK Bina Nusantara Jaya Lubuklinggau, 3(1), 30–38. https://doi.org/10.52303/jb.v3i1.38
Kementerian Sosial Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Menteri Sosial Nomor 5 Tahun 2021 tentang Pelaksanaan Bantuan Sembako. Jakarta.
Liawan, S. (2019). Decision Support System for Poor Student Aid Admission Selection (BSM) using the Topsis Method. International Journal of Basic and Applied Science, 6(36), 2676–2682. Retrieved from https://www.ijobas.pelnus.ac.id/index.php/ijobas/article/view/38%0Ahttps://www.ijobas.pelnus.ac.id/index.php/ijobas/article/download/38/27
M, T. H., & Dewi, U. (2018). Pemanfaatan Simple Additive Weight (Saw) Dalam Market Targeting Untuk Menentukan Cabang Baru Pada Perusahaan Butik X. Komputa : Jurnal Ilmiah Komputer Dan Informatika, 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.34010/komputa.v7i1.2530
Majid, A. A., Pramita Widyassari, A., Teknologi, S. T., Cepu, R., & Widyassari, A. P. (2022). SPK Penerima Bantuan Rumah Tidak Layak Huni (RTLH) Menggunakan Simple Additive Weighting (SAW) di Desa Nglungger. SIMETRIS, 16(1).
Menteri Sosial Republik Indonesia. (2022). Keputusan Menteri Sosial Republik Indonesia Tentang Kriteria Fakir Miskin (Nomor 262/ HUK/ 2022). Jakarta.
Nur Faizah Al Bahriyatul Baqir. (2022, January). Tak Semua Warga Miskin Bisa Dapat PKH atau BPNT pada 2023, Simak 5 Aspek dan 9 Kriteria Kemiskinan Terbaru. LampungNesia.Com.
Putra, G. W., & Apriyanto, B. (2022). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Bantuan Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) Dengan Menggunakan Metode Simple Additive Weighting (Saw) Berbasis Web. OKTAL: Jurnal Ilmu Komputer Dan Science, 1(08), 1234–1245.
Ramsari, N., & Hidayat, T. (2020). APLIKASI SISTEM PENDUKUNG KEPUTUSAN MASYARAKAT PADA MASA PANDEMI MENGGUNAKAN ALGORITMA SIMPLE ADDITIVE WEIGHTING ( SAW ) BERBASIS FRAMEWORK LARAVEL. X(2).
Saputra, Y. T., Fitriasih, S. H., & Setiyowati, S. S. (2019). Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pembelian Mobil Menggunakan Metode Technique for Order Preference By Similarity of Ideal Solution (Topsis) Di Kelip Motor Karanganyar. Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi (TIKomSiN), 7(1). https://doi.org/10.30646/tikomsin.v7i1.410
Siregar, V. M. M., Irmayanti;, Julyanti;, E., Hrp;, N. A., Jannah;, M., Sagala;, E., … Arief, A. S. (2021). Decision support system for selection of food aid recipients using SAW method. 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON TECHNOLOGY, INFORMATICS, AND ENGINEERING 2021. Malang: AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0094385
Yusnaeni, W., & Ningsih, R. (2019). Analisa Perbandingan Metode Topsis, Saw Dan Wp Melalui Uji Sensitifitas Untuk Menentukan Pemilihan Supplier. Jurnal Informatika, 6(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.31311/ji.v6i1.4399
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL ADVANCE TOURISM, MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
